A Viable Case

Key issues and global lessons in repowering old wind projects

Repowering of old wind projects is a low-hanging fruit to increase wind generation without using extra land. India has a significant number of old wind turbines, with a capacity of less than 1 MW, which have the potential for repowering in wind-rich sites. Among wind-rich st­a­­tes, Tamil Nadu has the oldest wind tur­bines, which are over 30 years old and id­e­al for repowering. In the state, around 53 per cent of the turbines are in the sub-550 kW category and were installed prior to 2000. Now, wind turbines of capacity 2-3 MW are available. Therefore, repowering of the old turbines with modern high ca­pa­city turbines has the potential to more than quadruple the energy generation at these sites. The capacity utilisation factor (CUF) in wind-rich sites is around 14 per cent and can be improved to around 25 per cent post-repowering.

Key issues with repowering in India

Fragmented ownership of wind farms is one of the key issues with repowering in India. Many owners who have commissi­oned their projects before 2022 own multiple turbines of less than 500 kW. This is­sue can be solved by giving stakes in new repowered projects to the existing owners in the ratio of their equity contribution. For existing owners, who are not willing to invest, the repowering project im­ple­­me­nter could either buy out their stake or all­o­cate the stake to the new project, as per the value of dismantled assets and the revenue forgone.

The need to upgrade the evacuation infrastructure is another key issue as repowering makes energy generation increase by two to three times. This is especially of co­n­­cern in wind-rich states such as Tamil Na­­du, where the majority of the projects are older than 15 years and connected to 11 kV lines for power evacuation. As a soluti­on, the repowering project impleme­n­ter co­uld be responsible for upgrading evacuation infrastructure from 11 kV-66 kV, until the pooling substation and the state transmissi­on utility can upgrade the transmission in­frastructure beyond the pooling substation.

Lack of financial incentives is another major issue that hampers the uptake of re­powering projects in India. There is lack of clarity between wind turbine owners and public utilities on the sale and tariff of additional energy procured after repowering. Wh­ile the Ministry of New and Rene­wable En­ergy introduced a repowering policy in 2016 to optimally utilise resourc­es, states have been slow to take the policy initiative forward. Due to lack of financial incentives, upgradation of transmission infrastructure to cater to the enhan­ced generation may not be viable. Some of the existing frag­men­ted wind turbine owners may not spe­nd on repowering, as it may take over 10 years to recover the additional investme­nts. These owners would prefer their current earnings unless incentives are given for taking the extra hassle of repowering.

As a solution, a generation-based incentive of Re 0.5 per kWh should be introdu­ced for repowering projects. In addition, renewab­le energy certificates could also be issu­ed to the repowering project implementer.

Sample business model

A sample business model could involve the central government providing in­cen­tives to the repowering project implemen­ter, who will be responsible for aggregating the project from fragmented ownership. The repowered project can sell el­ec­tricity to utilities through a new power purchase agreement (PPA) for additional ge­neration at the current tariff, to captive users through a PPA with the existing terms, or to open access consumers th­­­­rou­­­gh a subcontracting agreement.

The existing assets are acquired by the repowering project implementer, who could be an existing owner, a third-party independent power producer or any other investor. The transaction will account for the revenue forgone and the market cost of existing projects. The asset acquisition can also be done by offering the individual asset owners some stake in the new pr­oject. Owners who are unwilling to be part of the new project can be compensated for buyout of their asset and dee­m­ed loss of generation for the assets’ re­maining life. Meanwhile, utilities can co­nti­nue to procure power at the rates pres­cribed in the existing PPAs. The remaining amount required to cover the unit cost of the repowered pro­ject is to be borne by the government.

Denmark case study

Denmark is one of the leaders in repowering wind power projects. The country promoted repowering in two phases by an­nouncing schemes for 2001-03 and 2005-11. Phase I targeted turbines up to a ca­pa­city of 150 kW. Owners recei­ved a “re­po­wering certificate” equivalent to an additional tariff of Euro 2.3 ce­nts per kWh for the decommissioning of old turbines. The certificates could be tra­ded, whi­ch in­centivised the installation of larger wind turbines. Besides, an additional tariff was offered for two to three times of the scra­pped capacity for 12,000 load hours. Un­der this scheme, 1,480 old tur­bi­n­es with a combined capacity of 122 MW were repla­ced with 272 new turbines with a combined capacity of 324 MW.

Phase II targeted larger wind turbines, having a capacity of up to 450 kW. Turbine owners again received repowering certificates equivalent to Euro 1.6 cents per kWh for two times the decommissioned ca­pacity for 12,000 load hours. In additi­on, wind turbines were given at a general subsidy of Euro 1.3 cents per kWh and a balancing fee of Euro 0.3 cents per kWh and the spot price could not ex­ceed Euro 6.4 cents per kWh. Under this scheme, 811 old turbines, with a combi­ned capacity of 148 MW, were replaced with 146 new turbines with a cumulative capacity of 348 MW by the end of 2011.

At the Nørrekær Enge wind farm, 77 wind turbines of 220 kW capacity were replac­ed with 13 wind turbines of 2.3 MW capa­city, which doubled the energy production. As a result of repowering, large parts of the project area regained their original app­ear­ance. The old wind turbines were sold to a buyer for setting up a plant in Cuba. The Klim Fjordeholme wind farm, which was commissioned in 1996, was re­­po­w­ered in 2014. In this case, 35 wind turbines of 600 kW capacity were repla­ced with 22 wind turbines of 3.2 MW ca­pacity, resulting in an increase in energy production by three times. The old turbines were sold for recycling in Italy, Ire­land and other countries.

Germany case study

Germany too has been one of the most progressive countries in terms of repowering. It came with a repowering scheme in 2017. Under this scheme, 387 wind turbi­­nes, with a cumulative capacity of 467 MW, were replaced with 315 wind turbines with a cumulative capacity of 952 MW. The country focused on replacing old turbines of 300 kW or lower capacities with turbines of around 2 MW. A particular wind power project in Germany replaced 20 turbines of 200 kW capacity and seven turbines of 2 MW and witnessed an increase in investment by 2.7 times but the plant yield inc­reased by four times. Pre-repowering the in­vestment and yield of the wind project was Euro 6 million and 10 GWh respectively, which inc­reased to Euro 16 million and 40 GWh, res­pectively, post-repowering.


In sum, it is clear that repowering of wind projects is necessary to increase the efficiency of projects. Also, repowering should not be seen as a one-off event but should be planned for the next 30-40 years, given that the new repowered projects will also need repowering at some point as technology keeps advancing. The grid is underutilised currently and projects with low CUF are present, which can be replac­ed with projects with high CUF. The key question of who should be re­sponsible for doing this and what financial in­centives are needed to take this forward, remains open.

Based on a presentation by Hitesh Sachdeva, Partner, Infrastructure Corporate Finance, KPMG, at the virtual conference, “Repowering of Wind Turbines”, organised by Renewable Watch


Enter your email address